iperf3-Benchmark: ZeroTier vs Netmaker vs Tailscale vs direkte Switched-Verbindung
English
Deutsch
In unserem Setup war eine virtuelle Maschine (auf einem XCP-NG-Host) mit meinem Desktop (HP Z240, i7-6700 @3.4 GHz mit Ubuntu 22.04) in einem reinen Switched-Netzwerk mit 1Gbit-Links verbunden. Beide Geräte waren über einen MikroTik 10G-Switch (Marvell-Chip) verbunden.
Ich führte iperf3 -s auf der VM aus und iperf3 -c [IP-Adresse] auf dem Desktop. Reverse-Tests wurden nicht durchgeführt.
Direkte Switched-Verbindung (kein VPN)
iperf_results.txt
Connecting to host 10.9.2.103, port 5201
[ 5] local 10.9.2.10 port 56848 connected to 10.9.2.103 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 92.8 MBytes 779 Mbits/sec 0 444 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 90.7 MBytes 761 Mbits/sec 0 543 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 88.6 MBytes 743 Mbits/sec 0 816 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 90.0 MBytes 755 Mbits/sec 0 816 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 90.0 MBytes 755 Mbits/sec 0 856 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 88.8 MBytes 744 Mbits/sec 0 946 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 88.8 MBytes 745 Mbits/sec 0 946 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 90.0 MBytes 755 Mbits/sec 0 993 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 90.0 MBytes 755 Mbits/sec 0 993 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 88.8 MBytes 744 Mbits/sec 0 993 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 898 MBytes 754 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 896 MBytes 751 Mbits/sec receiverZeroTier
iperf_zerotier_results_raw.txt
Connecting to host 10.80.246.34, port 5201
[ 5] local 10.80.246.38 port 35474 connected to 10.80.246.34 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 59.9 MBytes 503 Mbits/sec 338 102 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 60.2 MBytes 505 Mbits/sec 313 188 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 63.9 MBytes 536 Mbits/sec 176 99.3 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 74.3 MBytes 623 Mbits/sec 174 113 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 67.7 MBytes 568 Mbits/sec 197 83.2 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 72.5 MBytes 609 Mbits/sec 218 228 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 61.3 MBytes 514 Mbits/sec 281 77.8 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 72.0 MBytes 604 Mbits/sec 213 91.2 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 65.4 MBytes 549 Mbits/sec 309 156 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 53.9 MBytes 453 Mbits/sec 190 121 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 651 MBytes 546 Mbits/sec 2409 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 650 MBytes 545 Mbits/sec receiverNetMaker
Netmaker verwendet intern eine normale (kernel-basierte) Wireguard-Verbindung, daher ist dies in gewisser Hinsicht ein Test der Wireguard-Leistung.
iperf_netmaker_stdout.txt
Connecting to host 10.230.113.3, port 5201
[ 5] local 10.230.113.1 port 35534 connected to 10.230.113.3 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 105 MBytes 881 Mbits/sec 0 1.01 MBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 104 MBytes 870 Mbits/sec 86 422 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 101 MBytes 849 Mbits/sec 0 488 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 98.8 MBytes 828 Mbits/sec 0 535 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 98.8 MBytes 828 Mbits/sec 0 584 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 104 MBytes 870 Mbits/sec 0 615 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 97.5 MBytes 818 Mbits/sec 7 472 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 104 MBytes 870 Mbits/sec 0 522 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 101 MBytes 849 Mbits/sec 0 580 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 102 MBytes 860 Mbits/sec 0 606 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1016 MBytes 852 Mbits/sec 93 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1014 MBytes 850 Mbits/sec receiverNetMaker
Netmaker verwendet intern eine normale (kernel-basierte) Wireguard-Verbindung, daher ist dies in gewisser Hinsicht ein Test der Wireguard-Leistung.
iperf_netmaker_results.txt
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 38.3 MBytes 321 Mbits/sec 389 60.0 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 37.6 MBytes 315 Mbits/sec 366 43.2 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 36.7 MBytes 308 Mbits/sec 431 52.8 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 38.5 MBytes 323 Mbits/sec 488 80.3 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 29.3 MBytes 246 Mbits/sec 356 38.4 KBytesTailscale
Für diesen Test wurde Tailscale 1.28.0 verwendet.
Während dieses Tests stellte ich sicher, dass die Tailscale-Verbindung über das Switched-Netzwerk hergestellt wurde und nicht über einen DERP-Server oder das geroutete Netzwerk lief.
tailscale_ping_output.txt
$ tailscale ping 100.64.0.3
pong from vm (fd5d:7b60:4742::3) via 10.9.2.103:41641 in 1msZusammenfassung
Ergebnisse:
iperf_tailscale_results.txt
Connecting to host 100.64.0.3, port 5201
[ 5] local 100.64.0.2 port 40690 connected to 100.64.0.3 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 38.3 MBytes 321 Mbits/sec 389 60.0 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 37.6 MBytes 315 Mbits/sec 366 43.2 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 36.7 MBytes 308 Mbits/sec 431 52.8 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 38.5 MBytes 323 Mbits/sec 488 80.3 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 29.3 MBytes 246 Mbits/sec 356 38.4 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 31.0 MBytes 260 Mbits/sec 351 86.3 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 27.1 MBytes 227 Mbits/sec 287 50.4 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 26.1 MBytes 219 Mbits/sec 210 46.8 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 27.1 MBytes 227 Mbits/sec 261 39.6 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 27.5 MBytes 231 Mbits/sec 222 40.8 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 319 MBytes 268 Mbits/sec 3361 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 318 MBytes 267 Mbits/sec receiverCheck out similar posts by category:
Headscale, Networking, Wireguard, ZeroTier
If this post helped you, please consider buying me a coffee or donating via PayPal to support research & publishing of new posts on TechOverflow